|
|
|
| Anesthetic Efficacy of Tricaine and Eugenol on Barbel Barbodes semifasciolatus at Room Temperature |
| SONG Lin, CHEN Xiaojiang, GAO Peng |
| Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the survival rate in operation and transportation, the anesthetic effect of tricaine and eugenol on barbel Barbodes semifasciolatus with body weight of (0.28±0.09) g acclimated for 2 weeks was investigated under water temperature of (25.0±0.5) ℃: the barbel were exposured to 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160 mg/L tricaine and 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 mg/L eugenol to explore the effective anesthetic dose; the barbel were exposed to tricaine with concentration of 140 mg/L and eugenol with a mass concentration of 25 mg/L after deep anesthesia exposure to water for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min, and then put back into clean water for recovery, recording the recovery time and counting the recovery rate. After exposing the barbel to tricaine with concentration of 10 mg/L and eugenol with concentration of 8 mg/L, the transport test was simulated to explore the application effect of two anesthetics for different operating purposes at room temperature.The results showed that the suitable mass concentrations were 100—140 mg/L for tricaine and 20—30 mg/L for eugenolm. After the deep anesthesia at tricaine mass concentration of 140 mg/L, the suitable exposure time in air was below 6 min, while the barbel was recoveryed to 100% within 8 min of air exposure after deep anesthesia at eugenol mass concentration of 25 mg/L. An anesthesia transport test showed the two anesthetics both had good transport effect within 48 h at fish: water ratio of 1∶15, and tricaine was available at fish: water ratio of 1∶20 under 72 h transportation with the survival rate up to 90.74%. Both tricaine and eugenol had good anaesthetic effects on the barbel in practical applications, were chosen for a suitable anaesthetic mass concentration according to different operating purposes and in combination with other elements.
|
|
Received: 07 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MATTSON N S. Metomidate, a better anesthetic for cod (Gadus morhua) in comparison with benzocaine, MS-222, chlorobutanol, and phenoxyethanol[J].Aquaculture,1989,83(1/2):89-94.
[2] 陈小江,熊俐灵,吴建顾,等.MS-222和丁香酚对四川华吸鳅耗氧率和排氨率的影响[J].南方水产科学,2020,16(4):69-74.
[3] 丁亚涛,汪之和,王林林,等.MS-222对鳊鱼麻醉保活运输效果的研究[J].水产科学,2019,38(3):296-304.
[4] TARKHANI R, IMANI A, JAMALI H, et al. Anaesthetic efficacy of eugenol on various size classes of angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare Schultze, 1823)[J].Aquaculture Research,2017,48(10):5263-5270.
[5] MITJANA O, BONASTRE C, TEJEDOR M T, et al. Simultaneous effect of sex and dose on efficacy of clove oil, tricaine methanesulfonate, 2-phenoxyethanol and propofol as anaesthetics in guppies, Poecilia reticulata(Peters)[J].Aquaculture Research,2018,49(6):2140-2146.
[6] CORSO M N, MARQUES L S, GRACIA L F G, et al. Effects of different doses of eugenol on plasma cortisol levels and the quality of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm in South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen)[J].Theriogenology,2019,125:135-139.
[7] CAO J, WANG Q, QIU W Q, et al. Transport and recovery of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) sedated with MS-222 and eugenol:effects on intermediary metabolism and osmoregulation[J].Animals,2021,11(8):2228.
[8] FÉLIX L M, LUZIO A, ANTUNES L, et al. Malformations and mortality in zebrafish early stages associated with elevated caspase activity after 24 h exposure to MS-222[J].Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology,2021,412:115385.
[9] 郑曙明,吴青,何利君.中国原生观赏鱼图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,2015:120-121.
[10] ANH B. Barbodes semifasciolatus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2012:e.T166936A1154475[EB/OL]. (2011-09-20)[2022-05-07].https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T166936A1154475.en.
[11] LE Q J. Transcriptomic and cortisol analysis reveals differences in stress alleviation by different methods of anesthesia in crucian carp (Carassius auratus)[J].Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2019,84:1170-1179.
[12] 刘思情,刘焕章.条纹小鲃种群遗传分析及其亲缘地理学格局[C]//中国海洋湖沼学会鱼类学分会,中国动物学会鱼类学分会2012年学术研讨会论文摘要汇编.兰州:中国海洋湖沼学会鱼类学分会,中国动物学会鱼类学分会,2012:44-45.
[13] 赖弘智,翁绍儒,张端宗,等.条纹小鲃Barbodes semifasiolatus (Günther, 1868)人工繁养殖及幼苗发育[J].特有生物研究,2008,10(1):35-44.
[14] 刘长琳,何力,陈四清,等.鱼类麻醉研究综述[J].渔业现代化,2007,34(5):21-25.
[15] MARKING L L, MEYER F P. Are better anesthetics needed in fisheries?[J].Fisheries,1985,10(6):2-5.
[16] 陈细华,朱永久,刘鉴毅,等.MS-222对中华鲟和施氏鲟的麻醉试验[J].淡水渔业,2006,36(1):39-42.
[17] MYLONAS C C. Comparative efficacy of clove oil and 2-phenoxyethanol as anesthetics in the aquaculture of Euro-pean sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) at different temperatures[J].Aquaculture,2005,246(1/2/3/4):467-481.
[18] 管敏,张德志,饶军,等.温度对中华鲟(Acipenser sinensis)幼鱼麻醉效果的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(2):576-585.
[19] 邓龙君,甘维熊,刘小帅,等.MS-222麻醉剂对短须裂腹鱼人工繁殖的麻醉影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(7):167-171.
[20] 王维鑫,崔爱君,徐永江,等.MS-222和丁香油对黄条鰤麻醉效果研究[J].渔业科学进展,2021,42(6):205-214.
[21] 王文豪,董宏标,孙永旭,等.MS-222和丁香酚在大口黑鲈幼鱼模拟运输中的麻醉效果[J].南方水产科学,2018,14(6):52-58.
[22] 郝长杰,庄平,赵峰,等.MS-222和丁香酚对暗纹东方鲀幼鱼麻醉效果的比较研究[J].海洋渔业,2019,41(5):546-554.
[23] 曹晓聪,黄小林,孙莘溢,等.丁香酚对黄斑篮子鱼幼鱼麻醉效果的研究[J].南方水产科学,2019,15(3):50-56.
[24] XUJ, LIU Y, ZHOU X, et al. Anaesthetic effects of eugenol on preservation and transportation of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco)[J].Aquaculture Research,2021,52(8):3796-3803.
[25] TARKHANI R, IMANI A, JAMALI H, et al. Anaesthetic efficacy of eugenol on flowerhorn (Amphilophus labiatus × Amphilophus trimaculatus)[J].Aquaculture Research,2017,48(6):3207-3215.
[26] 黄小林,戴超,虞为,等.丁香酚对卵形鲳鲹幼鱼的麻醉效果[J].广东海洋大学学报,2020,40(4):124-131.
[27] 张志山,朱树人,安丽,等.丁香酚对翘嘴鲌的麻醉效果研究[J].长江大学学报(自科版),2016,13(27):39-43.
[28] 曹杰,谢晶.间氨基苯甲酸乙酯甲磺酸盐在大菱鲆模拟保活运输中的作用效果[J].食品科学,2021,42(23):237-244.
[29] 杜浩,危起伟,杨德国,等.MS-222、丁香油、苯唑卡因对养殖美洲鲥幼鱼的麻醉效果[J].大连水产学院学报,2007,22(1):20-26.
[30] 李乐,樊英,王晓璐,等.不同温度下MS-222对硬头鳟幼鱼的麻醉效果[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2019,49(3):155-160.
[31] 贾超峰,许津,张志勇,等.丁香酚对真鲷(♀)×黑鲷(♂)杂交子一代麻醉效果的研究[J].海洋科学,2016,40(12):41-46.
[32] 张建明,田甜,姜伟.丁香酚对长薄鳅幼鱼麻醉效果的研究[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(2):451-456. |
|
|
|
