基于虾夷扇贝自交家系的双列杂交配合力分析

doi:10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.23032

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1973 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to evaluate the application of the "purebred first and hybridized later" germplasm improvement technique in yesso scallop Patinopecten yessoensis, a combining ability analysis of survival traits during the larval and adult stages was conducted by employing a 3×3 complete diallel cross design consisting of the nine possible combinations of parents and their reciprocal crosses. The offsprings of three selfing F₁ families (21#, 12#, and 16#) were cultured and the survival rates were evaluated in each combination. The results showed that there were significant differences (P＜0.05) in survival rates among different combinations at all stages except for the fertilization rate during the larval stage. The variations in the size and direction of the general combining abilities (GCA) were observed in the three parents, with significant differences at days 27, 140, 200, and 440, especially at day 140 with effective value of -6.88—8.25. Furthermore, the specific combining abilities (SCA) and observed 62.96% opposite directions were investigated between different mating combinations and their reciprocal crosses during the larval stage, with the maximal SCA value of 18.33 in 16#×12#. During the adult stage, the size and direction of SCA were also varied with decreasing effect values from the larval to adult stages (27—140 d). Overall, the effectiveness of the "purebred first and hybridized later" breeding strategy was shown a hybrid advantage in survival traits, particularly in the 21#×12# and 16#×12# combinations. Additionally, a strong efficiency in purge genetic load was found in yesso scallop with 21#×21#, 12#×12#, and 16#×16#, providing theoretical basis and data support for genetic improvement of yesso scallop.

Key words： Patinopecten yessoensis diallel cross general combining abilities (GCA) specific combining abilities (SCA) selfing

Received: 27 April 2023

S968.313

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAO Liang
	GAO Shan
	JIANG Jingwei
	ZHOU Zunchun

Cite this article:

ZHAO Liang,GAO Shan,JIANG Jingwei, et al. Combining Ability Analysis of Diallel Cross Based on Selfing Family of Yesso Scallop Patinopecten yessoensis[J]. Fisheries Science, 2024, 43(4): 541-549.

URL:

https://www.shchkx.com/EN/10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.23032 OR https://www.shchkx.com/EN/Y2024/V43/I4/541

[1] TRACHTENBERG H L. The analysis of the results of professor Johannes Schmidt's diallel crossings with trout[J]. Journal of Genetics,1921,11(1):75-78.
[2] WANG X L, YAO Y Y, PENG H R, et al. The relationship of differential expression of genes in GA biosynthesis and response pathways with heterosis of plant height in a wheat diallel cross[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2009,54(17):3029-3034.
[3] MAT N H C, BHUIYAN M A R, YAAKOB Z, et al. Full diallel crosses in superior parents of Jatropha curcas L[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2020,151:112482.
[4] OUYANG Y, LI X, ZHANG Q. Understanding the genetic and molecular constitutions of heterosis for developing hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics,2022,49(5):385-393.
[5] MÍNGUEZ C, SÁNCHEZ J P, HERNÁNDEZ P, et al. Genetic analysis of meat quality traits in maternal lines of rabbit and their diallel cross[J]. Meat Science,2017,131:1-8.
[6] SUNGKHAPREECHA P, CHANKITISAKUL V, DUANGJINDA M, et al. Combining abilities, heterosis, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in a diallel cross from black-bone chickens and Thai native chickens[J]. Animals,2022,12(13):1602.
[7] 龚雅婷,傅建军,朱文彬,等.大口黑鲈2群体双列杂交子代的生长比较及通径分析[J].上海海洋大学学报,2022,31(1):131-139.
[8] LIANG Y X, ZHANG G H, JIANG G W, et al. Hybridization between “Haida No. 1” and orange-shell line of the Pacific oyster reveals high heterosis in survival[J]. Aquaculture,2022,551:737945.
[9] WANG J J, ZHOU Z H, MA H T, et al. Genetic recombination of the mantle color pattern of two boring giant clam (Tridacna crocea) strains[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science,2021,8:657762.
[10] FERNANDES E M, DE ALMEIDA L C F, HASHIMOTO D T, et al. Survival of purebred and hybrid Serrasalmidae under low water temperature conditions[J]. Aquaculture,2018,497:97-102.
[11] DAI P, WANG H X, XIAO G Q, et al. Combining ability and heterosis analysis over two environments in a diallel cross of three families of the clam Meretrix meretrix[J]. Acta Oceanoloica Sinica,2014,33(10):37-42.
[12] 王卫军,李琪,杨建敏,等.长牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)三个选育群体完全双列杂交后代生长性状分析[J].海洋与湖沼,2015,46(3):628-635.
[13] YIN X S, HEDGECOCK D. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of yield in incomplete diallel crosses of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas[J]. Aquaculture,2019,510:43-50.
[14] ZHAO L, LI Y P, LI Y J, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies the genomic region associated with shell color in yesso scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis[J]. Marine Biotechnology,2017,19(3):301-309.
[15] 张明明,赵文.我国虾夷扇贝死亡原因的探讨及控制对策[J].中国水产,2008(2):65-66.
[16] 于佐安,李大成,王笑月,等.长海县筏养虾夷扇贝大规模死亡原因探讨[J].水产科学,2019,38(3):420-427.
[17] 沈丽红,郁桐炳.浅谈几种贝类混养模式[J].内陆水产,2006,31(2):41-42.
[18] LI Q, XU K F, YU R H. Genetic variation in Chinese hatchery populations of the Japanese scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) inferred from microsatellite data[J]. Aquaculture,2007,269(1/2/3/4):211-219.
[19] 孙欣,梁峻,赵学伟.虾夷扇贝獐子岛红品系家系建立及生长发育的比较[J].水产科学,2016,35(5):510-515.
[20] NGUYEN T T X, MOEHRING A J. Cross-generational comparison of reproductive success in recently caught strains of Drosophila melanogaster[J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology,2017,17(1):1-9.
[21] ATKINSON W D, WARWICK T. The role of selection in the colour polymorphism of Littorina rudis Maton and Littorina arcana Hannaford-Ellis (Prosobranchia:Littorinidae)[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,1983,20(2):137-151.
[22] ZHAO L, LI Y P, LOU J R, et al. Transcriptomic profiling provides insights into inbreeding depression in yesso scallop Patinopecten yessoensis[J]. Marine Biotechnology,2019,21(5):623-633.
[23] 廖承义,徐应馥,王远隆.栉孔扇贝的生殖周期[J].水产学报,1983,7(1):1-13.
[24] MASON J. The breeding of the scallop, Pecten maximus (L. ), in Manx waters[J]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,1958,37(3):653-671.
[25] 胡建兴,金启增.大亚湾合浦珠母贝的性腺发育周期[J].南海研究与开发,1992(3):1-7.
[26] 梁峻. 虾夷扇贝养殖群体数量性状遗传研究[D].青岛:中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所),2009.
[27] 傅强,王师,赵亮,等.不同近交系数的虾夷扇贝近交衰退研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(11):43-48.
[28] GRIFFING B. A generalised treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance[J]. Heredity,1956,10(1):31-50.
[29] 盛志廉,陈瑶生.数量遗传学[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:64-65.
[30] BRITTEN H B. Meta-analyses of the association between multilocus heterozygosity and fitness[J]. Evolution,1996,50(6):2158.
[31] HEDGECOCKD, DAVIS J P. Heterosis for yield and crossbreeding of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas[J]. Aquaculture,2007,272:S17-S29.
[32] XING Q, YANG Z J, ZHU X H, et al. Interspecific hybridization between Patinopecten yessoensis (♀) and P. caurinus (♂) with heterosis in growth and temperature tolerance[J]. Aquaculture,2022,547:737489.
[33] 傅强.虾夷扇贝(Patinopecten yessoensis)近交衰退的生物学效应及遗传机理研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2014.
[34] GRIFFING B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems[J]. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences,1956,9(4):463.
[35] BAKER R J. Issues in diallel analysis[J]. Crop Science,1978,18(4):533-536.
[36] HUO Z M, YAN X W, ZHAO L Q, et al. Larval and juvenile growth performance of Manila clam hybrids of two full-sib families[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China,2015,14(3):564-568.
[37] MALLET A L, HALEY L E. Growth rate and survival in pure population matings and crosses of the oyster Crassostrea virginica[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1983,40(7):948-954.
[38] CRUZ P, IBARRA A M. Larval growth and survival of two Catarina scallop (Argopecten circularis, Sowerby, 1835) populations and their reciprocal crosses[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,1997,212(1):95-110.
[39] DENG Y W, LIU X, ZHANG G F, et al. Heterosis and combining ability:a diallel cross of three geographically isolated populations of Pacific abalone Haliotis discus Hannai Ino[J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology,2010,28(6):1195-1199.
[40] CRNOKRAK P, BARRETT S C H. Perspective:purging the genetic load:a review of the experimental evidence[J]. Evolution,2002,56(12):2347-2358.
[41] BYERS D L, WALLER D M. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1999,30:479-513.
[42] CHEPTOU P O, IMBERT E, LEPART J, et al. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae)[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Biology,2000,13(3):522-531.
[43] BUSCH J W. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany,2005,92(9):1503-1512.
[44] MC PARLAND S, KEARNEY F, BERRY D P. Purging of inbreeding depression within the Irish Holstein-Friesian population[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution,2009,41(1):16.
[45] KELLER L F, WALLER D M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2002,17(5):230-241.
[46] HEDGECOCK D, PUDOVKIN A I. Sweepstakes reproductive success in highly fecund marine fish and shellfish:a review and commentary[J]. Bulletin of Marine Science,2011,87(4):971-1002.