|
|
|
| A Review of Bibliometric Analysis of Feeding Habits on DNA-Based Molecular Dietary Research |
| ZHANG Yuyang1, DONG Jianyu1, SUN Xin1, ZHANG Xiumei2,3 |
1. The Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China;
2. College of Fisheries, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China;
3. Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266072, China |
|
[1]PETHYBRIDGE H R, CHOY C A, POLOVINA J J, et al. Improving marine ecosystem models with biochemical tracers[J].Annual Review of Marine Science,2018,10(1):199-228.
[2]刘刚,宁宇,夏晓飞,等.高通量测序技术在野生动物食性分析中的应用[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3347-3356.
[3]窦永静,常亮,吴东辉.土壤动物食物网研究方法[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(1):247-255.
[4]高小迪,陈新军,李云凯.水生食物网研究方法的发展和应用[J].中国水产科学,2018,25(6):1347-1360.
[5]TRAUGOTT M. The prey spectrum of larval and adult Cantharis species in arable land:an electrophoretic approach[J].Pedobiologia,2003,47(2):161-169.
[6]WALTON M P, POWELL W, LOXDALE H D, et al. Electrophoresis as a tool for estimating levels of hymenopterous parasitism in field populations of the cereal aphid, Sitobion avenue[J].Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,1990,54(3):271-279.
[7]SYMONDSON W O C. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets[J].Molecular Ecology,2002,11(4):627-641.
[8]TRAUGOTT M, KAMENOVA S, RUESS L, et al. Chapter three—Empirically characterising trophic networks:what emerging DNA-based methods, stable isotope and fatty acid analyses can offer [M]//WOODWARD G, BOHAN D A. Ecological Networks in an Agricultural World. Amsterdam: Elsevier,2013,49:177-224.
[9]HÖSS M, KOHN M, PÄÄBO S, et al. Excrement analysis by PCR[J].Nature,1992,359(6392):199.
[10]ASAHIDA T, YAMASHITA Y, KOBAYASHI T. Identification of consumed stone flounder, Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky), from the stomach contents of sand shrimp, Crangon affinis (De Haan) using mitochondrial DNA analysis[J].Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,1997,217(2):153-163.
[11]AGUSTÍ N, DE VICENTE M C, GABARRA R. Development of sequence amplified characterized region (SCAR) markers of Helicoverpa armigera:a new polymerase chain reaction-based technique for predator gut analysis[J].Molecular Ecology,1999,8(9):1467-1474.
[12]REDD K S. Using DNA to explore predator diet in temperate marine ecosystems[D]. Hobart:University of Tasmania,2017.
[13]HEBERT P D N, GREGORY T R. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy[J].Systematic Biology,2005,54(5):852-859.
[14]HEBERT P D N, CYWINSKA A, BALL S L, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J].Proceedings. Biological Sciences,2003,270(1512):313-321.
[15]VALENTINI A, POMPANON F, TABERLET P. DNA barcoding for ecologists[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2009,24(2):110-117.
[16]POMPANON F, DEAGLE B E, SYMONDSON W O C, et al. Who is eating what:diet assessment using next generation sequencing[J].Molecular Ecology,2012,21(8):1931-1950.
[17]ZINGER L, BONIN A, ALSOS I G, et al. DNA metabarcoding—need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions[J].Molecular Ecology,2019,28(8):1857-1862.
[18]ALBERDI A, AIZPURUA O, BOHMANN K, et al. Promises and pitfalls of using high-throughput sequencing for diet analysis[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2019,19(2):327-348.
[19]洪巧巧.长江口中国花鲈的食性及分子生物学在食性分析上的应用[D].上海:华东理工大学,2012.
[20]邵昕宁,宋大昭,黄巧雯,等.基于粪便DNA及宏条形码技术的食肉动物快速调查及食性分析[J].生物多样性,2019,27(5):543-556.
[21]周天成,胡思敏,林先智,等.基于18S rDNA条形码技术的珊瑚礁区塔形马蹄螺(Tectus pyramis)食性分析[J].海洋科学,2020,44(2):99-107.
[22]王先锋,林承刚,许强,等.利用18S rDNA分子方法分析浒苔绿潮过境期间长牡蛎摄食情况的变化[J].海洋与湖沼,2017,48(6):1362-1370.
[23]陆琪,胡强,施小刚,等.基于分子宏条形码分析四川卧龙国家级自然保护区雪豹的食性[J].生物多样性,2019,27(9):960-969.
[24]CHEN C M, IBEKWE-SANJUAN F, HOU J H. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters:a multiple-perspective cocitation analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(7):1386-1409.
[25]李运景,侯汉清,裴新涌.引文编年可视化软件HistCite介绍与评价[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(12):135-138.
[26]KING R A, READ D S, TRAUGOTT M, et al. Molecular analysis of predation:a review of best practice for DNA-based approaches[J].Molecular Ecology,2008,17(4):947-963.
[27]VALENTINI A, MIQUEL C, NAWAZ M A, et al. New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing:the trnL approach[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2009,9(1):51-60.
[28]DEAGLE B E, KIRKWOOD R, JARMAN S N. Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces[J].Molecular Ecology,2009,18(9):2022-2038.
[29]DEAGLE B E, CHIARADIA A, MCINNES J, et al. Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins:is what Goes in what comes out[J].Conservation Genetics,2010,11(5):2039-2048.
[30]DEAGLE B E, TOLLIT D J, JARMAN S N, et al. Molecular scatology as a tool to study diet:analysis of prey DNA in scats from captive Steller sea lions[J].Molecular Ecology,2005,14(6):1831-1842.
[31]ZEALE M R K, BUTLIN R K, BARKER G L A, et al. Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2011,11(2):236-244.
[32]PIÑOL J, MIR G, GOMEZ-POLO P, et al. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2015,15(4):819-830.
[33]CLARE E L. Molecular detection of trophic interactions:emerging trends, distinct advantages, significant considerations and conservation applications[J].Evolutionary Applications,2014,7(9):1144-1157.
[34]TOJU H, BABA Y G. DNA metabarcoding of spiders, insects, and springtails for exploring potential linkage between above- and below-ground food webs[J].Zoological Letters,2018,4:4.
[35]OLMOS-PÉREZ L, ROURA Á, PIERCE G J, et al. Diet composition and variability of wild Octopus vulgaris and Alloteuthis media (Cephalopoda) paralarvae:a metagenomic approach[J].Frontiers in Physiology,2017,8:321.
[36]CHEN Y, GILES K L, PAYTON M E, et al. Identifying key cereal aphid predators by molecular gut analysis[J].Molecular Ecology,2000,9(11):1887-1898.
[37]ZAIDI R H, JAAL Z, HAWKES N J, et al. Can multiple-copy sequences of prey DNA be detected amongst the gut contents of invertebrate predators[J].Molecular Ecology,1999,8(12):2081-2087.
[38]BROWN D S, BURGER R, COLE N, et al. Dietary competition between the alien Asian musk shrew (Suncus murinus) and a re-introduced population of Telfair′s skink (Leiolopisma telfairii)[J].Molecular Ecology,2014,23(15):3695-3705.
[39]KARTZINEL T R, CHEN P A, COVERDALE T C, et al. DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015,112(26):8019-8024.
[40]RUPPERT K M, KLINE R J, RAHMAN M S. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding:a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA[J].Global Ecology and Conservation,2019,17:e00547.
[41]SIEGENTHALER A, WANGENSTEEN O S, BENVENUTO C, et al. DNA metabarcoding unveils multiscale trophic variation in a widespread coastal opportunist[J].Molecular Ecology,2019,28(2):232-249.
[42]HAMBÖCK P A, WEINGARTNER E, DALÉN L, et al. Spatial subsidies in spider diets vary with shoreline structure:complementary evidence from molecular diet analysis and stable isotopes[J].Ecology and Evolution,2016,6(23):8431-8439.
[43]KAMENOVA S, MAYER R, RUBBMARK O R, et al. Comparing three types of dietary samples for prey DNA decay in an insect generalist predator[J].Molecu-lar Ecology Resources,2018,18(5):966-973.
[44]RENNSTAM RUBBMARK O, SINT D, CUPIC S, et al. When to use next generation sequencing or diagnostic PCR in diet analyses[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2019,19(2):388-399.
[45]THOMAS A C, NELSON B W, LANCE M M, et al. Harbour seals target juvenile salmon of conservation concern[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,2017,74(6):907-921.
[46]CAVALLO C, CHIARADIA A, DEAGLE B E, et al. Molecular analysis of predator scats reveals role of salps in temperate inshore food webs[J].Frontiers in Marine Science,2018,5:381.
[47]CLARKE L J, TREBILCO R, WALTERS A, et al. DNA-based diet analysis of mesopelagic fish from the southern Kerguelen Axis[J].Deep Sea Research Part Ⅱ:Topical Studies in Oceanography,2020,174.
[48]CZENZE Z J, TUCKER J L, CLARE E L, et al. Spatiotemporal and demographic variation in the diet of New Zealand lesser short-tailed bats (Mystacina tuberculata)[J].Ecology and Evolution,2018,8(15):7599-7610.
[49]GORDON R, IVENS S, AMMERMAN L K, et al. Molecular diet analysis finds an insectivorous desert bat community dominated by resource sharing despite diverse echolocation and foraging strategies[J].Ecology and Evolution,2019,9(6):3117-3129.
[50]DRINKWATER R, SCHNELL I B, BOHMANN K, et al. Using metabarcoding to compare the suitability of two blood-feeding leech species for sampling mammalian diversity in North Borneo[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2019,19(1):105-117.
[51]BOHMANN K, EVANS A, GILBERT M T P, et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2014,29(6):358-367.
[52]CASEY J M, MEYER C P, MORAT F, et al. Reconstructing hyperdiverse food webs:gut content metabarcoding as a tool to disentangle trophic interactions on coral reefs[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,2019,10(8):1157-1170.
[53]MALOY A P, NELLE P, CULLOTY S C, et al. Identifying trophic variation in a marine suspension feeder:DNA- and stable isotope-based dietary analysis in Mytilus spp.[J].Marine Biology,2013,160(2):479-490.
[54]KERLEY G I H, LANDMAN M, FICETOLA G F, et al. Diet shifts by adult flightless dung beetles Circellium bacchus, revealed using DNA metabarcoding, reflect complex life histories[J].Oecologia,2018,188(1):107-115.
[55]BESSEY C, JARMAN S N, STAT M, et al. DNA metabarcoding assays reveal a diverse prey assemblage for Mobula rays in the Bohol Sea, Philippines[J].Ecology and Evolution,2019,9(5):2459-2474.
[56]BROWN D S, EBENEZER K L, SYMONDSON W O C. Molecular analysis of the diets of snakes:changes in prey exploitation during development of the rare smooth snake Coronella austriaca[J].Molecular Ecology,2014,23(15):3734-3743.
[57]ŠERIĆ JELASK L, JURASOVIĆ J, BROWN D S, et al. Molecular field analysis of trophic relationships in soil-dwelling invertebrates to identify mercury, lead and cadmium transmission through forest ecosystems[J].Molecular Ecology,2014,23(15):3755-3766.
[58]BOYER S, WRATTEN S D, HOLYOAKE A, et al. Using next-generation sequencing to analyse the diet of a highly endangered land snail (Powelliphanta augusta) feeding on endemic earthworms[J].PLoS One,2013,8(9):e75962.
[59]席晓晴,鲍宝龙,章守宇.DNA条形码在马鞍列岛海域皮氏叫姑鱼胃含物鉴定中的应用[J].水产学报,2017,41(10):1533-1541.
[60]纪东平,卞晓东,宋娜,等.荣成俚岛斑头鱼摄食生态研究[J].中国水产科学,2015,22(1):88-98.
[61]龚玉艳,詹凤娉,杨玉滔,等.南海鸢乌贼摄食习性的初步研究[J].南方水产科学,2016,12(4):80-87.
[62]王雪芹.稻田捕食性天敌对稻飞虱的捕食作用及其生态学机理研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2018.
[63]林先智,胡思敏,刘胜,等.传统测序与高通量测序在稚鱼食性分析中的比较[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(9):3093-3101.
[64]NAYFACH S, POLLARD K S. Toward accurate and quantitative comparative metagenomics[J].Cell,2016,166(5):1103-1116.
[65]钟文涛.基于分子生物技术的狼蛛摄食分析及控虫效能评价[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
[66]陈炼,吴琳,刘燕,等.环境DNA metabarcoding及其在生态学研究中的应用[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4573-4582.
[67]陈信忠,郭书林,龚艳清.鱼类DNA条形码技术的应用进展[J].水产科学,2017,36(6):834-842.
[68]ARRIZABALAGA-ESCUDERO A, MERCKX T, GARCÍA-BAQUERO G, et al. Trait-based functional dietary analysis provides a better insight into the foraging ecology of bats[J].Journal of Animal Ecology,2019,88(10):1587-1600.
[69]BOYER F, MERCIER C, BONIN A, et al. Obitools:a unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,2016,16(1):176-182. |
|
|
|
