|
|
|
| Effect of Three Types of Water Quality Control Methods on Sediment Enzyme Activity in Sea Cucumber Pond |
| WEI Yanan1, ZHANG Dongsheng1, LIN Qing1, SUN Guangwei1, LEI Zhaolin1, ZHANG Jinyuan1, GUO Chao2, CHEN Jifeng2, ZHOU Wei1,3 |
1.College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China;
2.Haida Group, Guangzhou510000, China;
3.Dalian Fisheries Association of Industrial Technology Innovation, Dalian 116023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper reported the annual changes in the activities of amylase, protease, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase in sea cucumber sediments under three types of water quality control methods from October 2015 to September 2016. The results showed that under the three water quality control methods, the annual change in amylase activity in the pond sediments was 0.126—0.880 mg/g, the annual mean value (0.410±0.180) mg/g, the annual change of protease activity was 0.024—0.472 mg/g, the annual mean value (0.190±0.103) mg/g, the annual change in alkaline phosphatase activity was 0.068—1.042 mg/g, the annual mean value (0.340±0.196) mg/g, and the annual change in dehydrogenase activity was 12.092—52.794 mL/g, annual mean value (26.980±8.295) mL/g.The activities of protease, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase in the pond sediments under the three water quality control methods were the highest in the natural tidal water quality control method ponds with the largest variation range.The mean value of amylase activity was the lowest in natural ponds and the highest in the water regulating machine system ponds.This is related to the lowest organic matter in the water regulating machine system ponds, the highest content of organic matter in the natural pond, and the highest bacterial diversity and the highest number of fungi in the water regulating machine system ponds. This indicates that the water regulating machine system can quickly remove the organic compounds of nitrogen and phosphorus from the sediments, which is beneficial to the normal material circulation of the pond. In this paper, from the perspective of sediment enzyme activity, the mechanism of the difference between the effect of the water regulating machine system and the other two water quality control methods was discussed.
|
|
Received: 01 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]张春云,陈国福,徐仲,等. 海参疾病学研究进展[J].水产科学,2011,30(10):644-648.
[2]王祖峰.仿刺参养殖池塘三种水质控制技术效果的比较[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2016.
[3]骆向萍,张静,刘园园.底部微孔增氧技术在海参池塘养殖中应用对比试验[J].河北渔业,2014(4):25-26.
[4]王海波.三种紫色土塘泥的土壤酶活性动态研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[5]林海.不同增氧方式及沉水植物修复河蟹池塘养殖环境的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.
[6]杨申.三种水质调控方式对海参池塘沉降颗粒物质组成特征的影响[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2017.
[7]毕丽仙.三种水质控制技术下参池沉积物酶活性及其微生物群落结构组成的比较[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2018.
[8]国家海洋局. GB/T 12763.6—2007,海洋调查规范 第6部分:海洋生物调查[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[9]雷衍之,朴文豪,白禄君,等.养鱼池底泥耗氧速率的研究[J].大连水产学院学报,1992,6(增刊):6-13.
[10]国家海洋局.GB/T 17378.5—2007,海洋监测规范 第5部分:沉积物分析[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[11]关松萌.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[12]李娜.冻融作用对吉林西部典型土壤碳氮酶的影响机制及温室气体排放研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2012.
[13]Bohme L, Langer U, Bohme F.Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2005,109(1/2):141-152.
[14]Madejon E, Moreno F, Murilloj M, et al.Soil biochemical response to long-term conservation tillage under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions[J]. Soil and Till Research,2007,94(2):346-352.
[15]Zhang J S, Guo J F, Chen G S, et al. Soil microbial biomass and its controls[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2005,16(4):327-330.
[16]曹湛波,王磊,李凡,等.土壤呼吸与土壤有机碳对不同秸秆还田的响应及其机制[J].环境科学,2016,37(5):1908-1914.
[17]王华金,朱能武,杨崇,等.石油污染土壤生物修复对土壤酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(6):1178-1184.
[18]郑学博,樊剑波,何园球,等.沼液化肥全氮配比对土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):142-150.
[19]曾智科.三江源区高寒草甸土壤微生物季节动态及对草地退化的响应[D].西宁:青海师范大学,2009.
[20]李岩,黎二萍,刘钊玲,等.猫儿山不同海拔优势植被土壤酶活性及其影响因素[J].南方园艺,2018,29(6):15-20.
[21]申佳艳,李小英,袁勇,等.纳板河自然保护区土壤酶对不同海拔、坡向的响应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):111-119,125.
[22]王芳,田秀平,韩晓日,等.养殖池塘底泥磷酸酶活性与释磷关系及其调控的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(8):1683-1688.
[23]张哲.湖泊沉积物碱性磷酸酶活性差异及其对磷元素生态效应影响[D].保定:河北科技大学,2013.
[24]万忠梅,宋长春.三江平原小叶章湿地土壤酶活性的季节动态[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(5):1215-1220.
[25]张敏.三种水质调控方式对海参池塘环境中微生物数量及底泥酶活性的影响研究[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2017.
[26]娄斯艺.三种水质调控方式下海参池塘异养菌数量及区系组成的初步研究[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2018.
[27]党子乔.三种水质调控方式对海参池塘沉积物—水界面N、P通量的周年变化影响[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2017. |
|
|
|
