|
|
|
| Effects of Shell Phenotypic Traits on Body Weight of Clam Lutraria sieboldii |
| ZOU Jie1,PENG Huijing1, ZHANG Shoudu2, ZHANG Yue1, YANG Jialin3 |
1. Guangxi Institute of Oceanology, Beihai 536000, China;
2. National Oceanographic Center, Qingdao 266071, China;
3. Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Shell length (x1), shell height (x2), shell width (x3), shell weight (x4), body weight (y1) and soft part weight (y2) were measured in 150 samples of clam Lutraria sieboldii randomly collected from the 20-month-old population bred in 2 generations and cultured in the 5—7 m-deep sediment tidal zone and correlated by path analysis to evaluate the effects of shell phenotypic traits on body weight of the clam. It was found that the maximal coefficient of variance was in shell weight, with very significant difference in correlation coefficients between the phenotypic traits among the phenotypic parameters of the clam(P＜0.01),followed by the correlation coefficients between body weight and shell weight and soft-body weight (over 0.850). The multiple regression analysis indicated that shell weight had a major effect on body weight traits of the clam, with the path coefficient of 0.369 between shell weight and body weight, and larger path coefficient of up to 0.657 between shell weight and shell length. The effect of shell weight on soft part weight was reduced, with path coefficient of 0.436 between shell weight and body weight, 0.086 higher than that between shell weight and shell length, greater direct effect of shell weight than the indirect effect. The regression equation was expressed as y1=-14.769+0.613x1+2.002x4 (r2=0.806) between shell length (x1) and shell weight (x4) to body weight (y1) and y2=-0.980+0.281x1+0.500x4 (r2=0.549) between soft part weight (y2), r2<0.850, indicating that other factors had a impact on body weight traits. The findings provide basic data for the selection of traits for clam L. sieboldii.
|
|
Received: 07 August 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]赵旺,杨蕊,胡静,等. 5月龄斜带石斑鱼形态性状对体质量影响的通径分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报,2017,32(5):557-562.
[2]边力,刘长琳,陈四清,等. 不同生长期圆斑星鲽形态性状对体重影响的通径分析[J]. 中国水产科学,2017,24(6):1168-1175.
[3]杜美荣,刘毅,蒋增杰,等. 底播虾夷扇贝数量性状的相关性和通径分析[J]. 水产科学,2015,34(1):8-13.
[4]刘辉,张兴志,鹿瑶,等. 菲律宾蛤仔橙色品系壳形态性状对质量性状的通径及多元回归分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报,2015,30(5):514-518.
[5]王冲. 栉孔扇贝不同性别间重要经济性状比较及通径分析[J]. 水产科学,2013,32(8):441-446.
[6]郭文学,闫喜武,马贵范,等.两种四角蛤蜊(Mactra veneriformis)壳内色品系选育初探[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2012,43(2):262-267.
[7]李建立,王春德,李朝霞,等.紫扇贝和海湾扇贝杂交家系的生长和通径分析[J]. 海洋科学,2012,36(8):15-20.
[8]孙海峰,刘国兴,蒋连玉. 罗氏沼虾的形态性状对体重的相关性分析[J]. 水产养殖,2018,39(7):48-54.
[9]杜家菊,陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报,2010,45(2):4-6.
[10]巫旗生,曾志南,宁岳,等. 钝缀锦蛤形态性状对活体质量的影响[J]. 水产科学,2018,37(1):110-114.
[11]薛宝宝,李浩,牛东红,等. 不同月龄缢蛏新品种数量性状的相关与通径分析[J]. 水产学报,2018,42(6):941-949.
[12]杜美荣,方建光,高亚平,等. 不同贝龄栉孔扇贝数量性状的相关性和通径分析[J]. 水产学报,2017,41(4):580-587.
[13]李莉,郑永允,徐科凤,等. 不同贝龄毛蚶壳形态性状对体质量的影响[J]. 海洋科学,2015,39(6):54-58.
[14]陆雅凤,赵晟,徐梅英,等. 东极厚壳贻贝养殖群体表型性状的相关与通径分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(3):147-150.
[15]闫喜武,王琰,郭文学,等. 四角蛤蜊形态性状对重量性状的影响效果分析[J]. 水产学报,2011,35(10):1513-1518.
[16]巫旗生,宁岳,曾志南,等. 不同贝龄“金蛎1号”福建牡蛎数量性状的相关性和通径分析[J]. 厦门大学学报:自然科学版,2018,57(1):72-78.
[17]林清,王亚骏,王迪文,等. 太平洋牡蛎和葡萄牙牡蛎养殖群体数量性状比较分析[J]. 海洋通报,2014,33(1):106-111.
[18]孙泽伟,郑怀平,杨彦鸿,等. 近江牡蛎养殖群体数量性状间的相关及通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报,2010,26(6):332-336.
[19]宋坚,张伟杰,常亚青,等. 硬壳蛤形态性状对活体重的影响效果分析[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2010,37(2):273-277.
[20]Huo Z M, Wu Y A, Gao Z Y, et al.Effects of shell morphological traits on the weight trait of the orange strain of the Manila clam[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(2):75-78.
[21]由学策,尹东红,曹淑青,等. 缢蛏体形性状对活体重和肉重的影响效果分析[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2011,38(3):363-367.
[22]韩自强,李琪. 长牡蛎壳橙品系形态性状与体质量的相关及通径分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版,2017,47(12):49-55.
[23]Zhang A G, Wang L L, Yang X L, et al. Relationship between shell morphological traits and body weight in two estuarine clams, Meretrix meretrix and Cyclinasinensis in Shuangtaizi Estuary, Bohai Sea in China[J].Journal of Shellfish Research,2018,37(5):989-996. |
|
|
|
