广西合浦珠母贝3个不同群体遗传关系分析

doi:10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.21103

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6410 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to explore the cross population hybridization of pearl oyster Pinctada fucata ssp. martensii in Guangxi, 15 samples of 2-year-old pearl oyster were randomly selected from the wild population (F₁), the breeding population (“Haixuan No. 1” F₄) and the cultured population in the Beihai were used for double-enzyme digestion by Sea15 1-end EcoRⅠ (G^AATTC) and 2-end NlaⅢ (Hin1Ⅱ, CATG^), and then 500 ng of qualified DNA samples were constructed using ddRAD library construction method. The pair-end sequencing library was used in the length of 300—500 bp to analyze the genetic relationship among the three populations through single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. More than 585 000 SNPs of the 3 populations were statistically obtained, with the observed heterozygosity of 0.1975, 0.1679 and 0.1783, the expected heterozygosity of 0.2545, 0.2469 and 0.2732, average inbreeding coefficient of 0.2075, 0.3449 and 0.3465, and the polymorphism information content of 0.2032, 0.2089 and 0.2241. The inbreeding coefficient of breeding population was close to cultured population, and there was higher genetic polymorphism in wild population and cultured population than that in the breeding population. The phylogenetic tree and PCA analysis revealed that some samples of breeding population and cultured population had close genetic relationship. Fst analysis showed that the minimal genetic differentiation index was observed between breeding population and cultured population, indicating that some parents were likely to be homologous. The wild population, breeding population and cultured population had average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) of 59.1, 49.5 and 56.6, the average length of ROH 0.312 Mb, 0.313 Mb and 0.311 Mb, and the average SNPs content 59, 50 and 73, the range of F_ROH 0.0149—0.0240, 0.0159—0.0201 and 0.017—0.0246, respectively, indicating that the real inbreeding phenomenon of each population was not obvious. The average linkage disequilibrium(LD) decay distances were 0.4 kb in wild population, 0.4 kb in breeding population and 0.2 kb in cultured population(r²=0.2), and the attenuation rate of cultured population>wild population>breeding population, which was related to artificial breeding. The findings indicate that wild population × breeding population or wild population ×cultured population could be used in cross breeding project, and the results may serve as an alternative way to learn about the maintenance and utilization of genetic resources of pearl oyster population in Guangxi.

Key words： Pinctada fucata ssp. martensii cross breeding single nucleotide polymorphism genetic differentiation runs of homozygosity

Received: 12 June 2021

S968.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZOU Jie
	PENG Huijing
	ZHENG Debin
	ZHANG Shoudu

Cite this article:

ZOU Jie,PENG Huijing,ZHENG Debin, et al. Genetic Relationship among Three Populations of Pearl Oyster Pinctada fucata ssp. martensii in Guangxi, China[J]. Fisheries Science, 2023, 42(3): 466-473.

URL:

https://www.shchkx.com/EN/10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.21103 OR https://www.shchkx.com/EN/Y2023/V42/I3/466

[1]范嗣刚,王婧璇,黄桂菊,等.合浦珠母贝选育家系的遗传多样性分析[J].南方水产科学,2016,12(5):90-96.
[2]王爱民,石耀华,周志刚.马氏珠母贝不同地理种群内自繁和种群间杂交子一代形态性状参数及相关性分析[J].海洋水产研究,2004,25(3):39-45.
[3]黄桂菊,陈飞飞,刘宝锁,等.合浦珠母贝3个养殖群体双列杂交F₁代的生长和遗传分析[J].海洋科学,2016,40(2):26-34.
[4]陈小宏,蔡强,陈海进,等.马氏珠母贝“海选1号”和对照群体生长性状的比较[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(1):84-86.
[5]谭杰,孙宗红,陶雅晋,等.马氏珠母贝F₈代4种壳色选育群体的EST-SSR遗传多样性分析[J].水产科学,2018,37(4):505-511.
[6]李耀国,刘文广,林坚士,等.马氏珠母贝SNP标记开发及家系遗传多态性分析[J].海洋通报,2016,35(1):96-102.
[7]喻达辉,朱嘉濠,贾晓平.我国珠母贝属(Pinctada)主要种类亲缘关系的初步分析[J].海洋与湖沼,2006,37(3):211-217.
[8]吕林兰,杜晓东,王嫣,等.马氏珠母贝3个野生种群及种群间杂交后代遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].水生生物学报,2008,32(1):26-32.
[9]尹立鹏,邓岳文,杜晓东,等.贝龄对马氏珠母贝植核贝生长、成活率和育珠性状的影响[J].中国水产科学,2012,19(4):715-720.
[10]CURNOW, R. N. Review of evolution and the genetics of populations, volume 4: variability within and among natural populations, by S. Wright[J]. Biometrics, 1979,35(1):359.
[11]白成,刘志刚,吴灶和,等.马氏珠母贝4种壳色家系遗传差异的SSR分析[J].广东海洋大学学报,2014,34(1):48-53.
[12]张嘉丽,罗燕秋,黄怡,等.马氏珠母贝近交与杂交家系的遗传结构比较[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2015,34(4):723-730.
[13]LU Y, SHAH T, HAO Z, et al. Comparative SNP and haplotype analysis reveals a higher genetic diversity and rapider LD decay in tropical than temperate germplasm in maize[J].PLoS One,2011,6(9):e24861.
[14]孔杰,金武,栾生,等.水产动物选择育种的近交分析[J].自然科学进展,2009,19(9):917-923.
[15]任晶莹,王卫军,徐涛,等.长牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)多代近交与自交家系遗传差异及生长性状比较[J].海洋与湖沼,2018,49(3):630-637.
[16]LANGDON C, EVANS F, JACOBSON D, et al. Yields of cultured Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas Thunberg improved after one generation of selection[J].Aquaculture,2003,220(1/2/3/4):227-244.
[17]傅强,王师,赵亮,等.不同近交系数的虾夷扇贝近交衰退研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(11):43-48.
[18]张景晓.长牡蛎近交家系生物学特性及遗传多样性分析[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2015:3-9.
[19]张沅.家畜育种学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:225-239.
[20]刘家鑫,魏霞,邓天宇,等.绵羊全基因组ROH检测及候选基因鉴定[J].畜牧兽医学报,2019,50(8):1554-1566.
[21]刘刚,孙飞舟,朱芳贤,等.连续性纯合片段在畜禽基因组研究中的应用[J].遗传,2019,41(4):304-317.
[22]PERIPOLLI E, STAFUZZA N B, MUNARI D P, et al. Assessment of runs of homozygosity Islands and estimates of genomic inbreeding in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle[J].BMC Genomics,2018,19(1):34.
[23]MASTRANGELO S, TOLONE M, DI GERLANDO R, et al. Genomic inbreeding estimation in small populations:evaluation of runs of homozygosity in three local dairy cattle breeds[J].Animal,2016,10(5):746-754.
[24]杨湛澄,黄河天,闫青霞,等.利用高密度SNP标记分析中国荷斯坦牛基因组近交[J].遗传,2017,39(1):41-47.
[25]李凯航,赵乐乐,陆雪林,等.基于SNP芯片的浦东鸡保种分析[J].中国家禽,2020,42(6):31-36.
[26]蔡岩,周永灿,冯永勤,等.中国贝类染色体研究现状与进展[J].热带生物学报,2014,5(3):297-306.