|
|
Growth of Hybrid F1 of Burnt-end Ark Scapharca broughtonii between Chinese and Korean Populations |
WU Yingying, LIU Tong, WANG Yingjun, ZOU Yan, SONG Aihuan, LIU Hongjun |
Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Utilization of Marine Germplasm Resources of Qingdao, Marine Biology Institute of Shandong Province, Qingdao 266104, China |
|
|
Abstract Four groups of hybrid F1 of burnt-end ark Scapharca broughtonii, including Chinese population ♀×Korean population ♂ (HZ-1), Chinese population♀ ×Chinese population ♂ (ZZ), Korean population ♀×Chinese population ♂ (HZ-2), and Korean population ♀×Korean population♂ (HH), were established by reciprocal cross between Chinese population and Korean population. The juvenile shellfish were reared in a cage in the sea area (N 35°32′41.85″, E 119°41′29.49″) and sampled at the ages of 4, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 months to evaluate growth, survival and heterosis of juvenile shellfish. The variation trend of heterosis of shell length, shell height, shell width and wet body weight was found to be the same in HZ-1, with increase with the increase in age at the early stage, and the maximal at the age of 11 months (heterosis rate of 7.73% in shell length, 4.80% in shell height, 8.84% in shell width, and 27.44% in wet body weight, the maximal heterosis rate in body weight), and then significant decrease at the age of 13 months. The 7-month old and 11-month old HZ-2 had the basically positive values of the heterosis rate in the 4 traits, with the maximal value of 2.61%, and with heterosis rates in survival of 5.89% in HZ-1 and 4.15% in HZ-2, showing higher in HZ-1 than in HZ-2. Comprehensive analysis indicated that HZ-1 as an ideal breeding candidate had obvious heterosis in growth performance and survival rate. The findings provide theoretical support and technical reference for the development and utilization of germplasm resources and cross breeding of burnt-end ark.
|
Received: 10 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]王子臣,张国范,高悦勉.温度和饵料对魁蚶性腺发育的影响[J].大连水产学院学报,1987,2(2):1-10. [2]邱显寅,郭学武,王俊.魁蚶中间育成试验研究[J].海洋水产研究,1994,15(15):55-63. [3]郑永允,张晓燕,栾红兵,等.魁蚶亲贝控温促熟试验[J].齐鲁渔业,1994,11(5):7-9. [4]贺先钦,薛真福,王有君,等.魁蚶海区采苗技术的研究[J].水产科学,1996,15(6):3-7. [5]张丽敏,曹春梅.魁蚶浅海吊笼养殖试验[J].河北渔业,2013(8):48-50. [6]邹琰,郑永允,邱兆星,等.魁蚶亲贝促熟与健康苗种培育技术[J].水产科技情报,2010,37(2):95-98. [7]李晓,王颖,吴志宏,等.魁蚶对3种重金属生物富集动力学研究[J].水产科学,2016,35(5):578-582. [8]李克元.魁蚶病害发生原因及预防措施浅析[J].水产科学,1996,15(1):36-37. [9]姚红伟,郭晋,景娜娜.魁蚶增养殖状况及遗传多样性研究进展[J].河北渔业,2010(5):45-47. [10]Mao Y Z, Zhou C Y, Zhu L, et al. Identification and expression analysis on bactericidal permeability-increasing protein(BPI)/Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) of ark shell, Scapharca broughtonii[J]. Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2013,35(3):642-652. [11]张国范.海洋贝类遗传育种研究20年[J].厦门大学学报:自然科学版,2006,45(2):190-194. [12]常亚青,宋坚.杂交育种技术在海水养殖贝类中的应用及研究进展[J].水产科学,2005,24(4):39-41. [13]欧俊新.福建沿海杂交鲍育苗技术研究[J].海洋水产研究,2002,23(3):5-9. [14]蔡忠强,郑言鑫,任利群,等.魁蚶中国群体与韩国群体杂交子一代的生长和存活比较[J].渔业科学进展,2016,37(6):81-86. [15]郑言鑫,蔡忠强,王鹏,等.魁蚶中国群体与韩国群体杂交子一代养成期生长比较[J].渔业科学进展,2018,39(4):147-152. [16]孔令锋,腾爽爽,李琪.长牡蛎中国群体与日本群体杂交子一代的生长和存活比较[J].海洋科学,2013,37(8):78-84. [17]吴仲庆.水产生物遗传育种学[M].3版.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2000. [18]范兆廷.水产动物育种学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005:87-88. [19]刘童,邹琰,王英俊,等.魁蚶4个群体形态差异比较分析[J].水产科学,2019,38(5):676-681. [20]吴彪,梁超,杨爱国,等.基于SSR标记的魁蚶不同群体遗传结构的分析[J].海洋与湖沼,2012,43(4):863-869. [21]田吉腾,刘志鸿,杨爱国,等.魁蚶4个群体遗传多样性微卫星分析[J].渔业科学进展,2013,34(6):59-67. [22]Atchley W R, Zhu J.Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in mice[J].Genetics,1997,147(2):765-776. [23]Atchley W R, Xu S Z, Vogl C.Developmental quantitative genetic models of evolutionary change[J]. Developmental Genetics,1994,15(1):92-103. [24]刘小林,常亚青,相建海,等.栉孔扇贝不同种群杂交效果的初步研究[J].海洋学报,2003,25(1):93-99. [25]季士治,雷霁霖,王伟继,等.双列杂交法分析2个大菱鲆养殖群体的杂交效果[J].中国水产科学,2006,13(6):1001-1005. |
[1] |
JIANG Qingqing, GAO Jinwei, LIU Hongtao, JIANG Zhifei, ZHANG Wenhui, ZHANG Rui, WANG Yuqing, ZHANG Dan, JIA Xuying, DOU Yong, SHAO Peng, XIA Sudong, QIU Qi, ZHOU Wenli. Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Polypropylene on Growth and Antioxidant System of Green Alga Dunaliella salinas[J]. Fisheries Science, 2025, 44(3): 476-483. |
|
|
|
|