Effects of Different Straw-Returning on Macrobenthic Community Structure in Rice-Crayfish Fields During Winter and Spring
SUN Ying1,2,3, LI Wei1,2,3, XI Yewen4, CHENG Yongxu1,2,3, LI Jiayao1,2,3
1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Rice-Fish Farming Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 3. National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 4. Fisheries Technology Promotion Station of Anhui Province, Hefei 230000, China
Abstract：The purpose of this experiment is to study the characteristics of macrobenthic community changes before and after the application of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkia under the treatment of the amount of straw-returning to the rice field in winter and spring. Macrobenthic community structure including diversity, density and biomass were analyzed in red swamp crayfish in several 125 m2 ricecrayfish fields at Shanghai Ocean University Chongming Base (N 31°34', E 121°33') with varying amounts of straw-returning including 0(CK), 1500 kg/hm2(S1), 3500 kg/hm2(S2), and 4500 kg/hm2(S3) from December 2018 to July 2019. The results showed that before and after releasing crayfish, diversity index is presented as S2>S3>S1>CK and CK> S2> S3>S1,respectively. Before the release of crayfish, the relationship between total density, biomass and the amount of returning all showed as S3>S2>S1>CK. After the release of crayfish, the total density of S1, S2 and S3 treatment was dropped significantly. The calculation of the dominance index found that the density of Branchiura sowerbyi, Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, Hippeutis umbilicalis Benson was decreased significantly (P<0.05), suggesting that these might be important natural food for crayfish. Among them, the density of dominant species in S2 treatment was dropped significantly higher than that in S1 and S3 treatments. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that soil total phosphorus, soil bulk density and organic matter were the key factors influencing the macrobenthic community structure. Under the experimental conditions, considering the changes of macrobenthos community structure, soil fertility and aquaculture water indicators before and after crayfish feeding, S2 is the most suitable amount of straw returning to the field.
孙颖, 李威, 奚业文, 成永旭, 李嘉尧. 不同秸秆还田量对冬春季稻虾田大型底栖动物的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2023, 42(4): 556-565.
SUN Ying, LI Wei, XI Yewen, CHENG Yongxu, LI Jiayao. Effects of Different Straw-Returning on Macrobenthic Community Structure in Rice-Crayfish Fields During Winter and Spring. 水产科学, 2023, 42(4): 556-565.
[1]袁旭峰.稻虾共作种养生态农业模式及技术应用[J].基层农技推广,2017,5(9):102-104. [2]农业农村部渔业渔政管理局,全国水产技术推广总站,中国水产学会.中国小龙虾产业发展报告[J].中国渔业经济,2019,37(5):120-126. [3]滕江峰,沙锦程,宋长太.稻虾连作实用技术[J].科学种养,2017(7):51-52. [4]江永红,宇振荣,马永良.秸秆还田对农田生态系统及作物生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2001,32(5):209-213. [5]吴婕,朱钟麟,郑家国,等.秸秆覆盖还田对土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2006,19(2):192-195. [6]谢军红,张仁陟,李玲玲,等.覆膜方式对一膜两年覆盖旱地玉米籽粒产量、水分利用效率和土壤水分平衡的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(6):1935-1942. [7]刘世平,陈后庆,聂新涛,等.稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(5):51-56. [8]曹志平,陈国康,张凯,等.不同土壤培肥措施对华北高产农田原生动物丰度的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):2992-2996. [9]孔云,张婷,李刚,等.不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤线虫群落的影响[J].华北农学报,2018,33(6):205-211. [10]熊晶,谢志才,陈静,等.转基因鲤鱼对大型底栖动物群落及多样性的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(4):377-382. [11]赵峰.池塘大型底栖动物群落结构及其部分生态功能的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2014. [12]杨旭,高梅香,张雪萍,等.秸秆还田对耕作黑土中小型土壤动物群落的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(7):2206-2216. [13]刘鹏飞,红梅,常菲,等.秸秆还田对黑土区西部农田中小型土壤动物群落的影响[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(1):139-146. [14]徐演鹏,谭飞,胡彦鹏,等.秸秆还田对黑土区农田中小型土壤节肢动物群落的影响[J].动物学杂志,2015,50(2):262-271. [15]潘宁,张守成,徐加健,等.秸秆还田对农作物生长土壤环境的影响及对策[J].上海农业科技,2010(2):22-23. [16]韩瑞芸,陈哲,杨世琦.秸秆还田对土壤氮磷及水土的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(9):148-154. [17]李涛,何春娥,葛晓颖,等.秸秆还田施氮调节碳氮比对土壤无机氮、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(12):1633-1642. [18]都雪,杨敬爽,宋聃,等.查干湖大型底栖动物群落结构及与环境因子的关系[J].水产学杂志,2020,33(6):61-67. [19]刘晓收,倪大朋,钟鑫,等.黄海大型底栖动物食物网结构和营养关系研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(9):20-33. [20]高欣,牛翠娟,胡忠军.太湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3329-3336. [21]朱苏葛,刘凌,罗娟,等.里下河地区典型湖泊大型底栖动物与环境因子的相关性分析[J].水资源保护,2016,32(3):99-104. [22]周凤霞,陈剑虹.淡水微型生物与底栖动物图谱[M].2版.北京:化学工业出版社,2011. [23]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000. [24]纪莹璐,张亮,宿凯,等.青岛董家口春季大型底栖动物群落结构及其与环境因子关系[J].海洋湖沼通报,2021,43(5):99-108. [25]宋伦,周遵春,王年斌,等.锦州湾夏季浮游动物的群落特征[J].水产科学,2006,25(8):408-412. [26]KENNEDY C R. The life history of Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri clap. (Oligochaeta:Tubificidae) and its adaptive significance[J].Oikos,1966,17(2):158. [27]LOTUFO G R, FLEEGER J W. Toxicity of sediment-associated Pyrene and phenanthrene to Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri (Oligochaeta:Tubificidae)[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,1996,15(9):1508-1516. [28]李艳,蔡永久,秦伯强,等.太湖霍甫水丝蚓(Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri claparède)的时空格局[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(3):450-459. [29]SMAYDA T J. Harmful algal blooms:their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea[J].Limnology and Oceanography,1997,42(5part2):1137-1153. [30]LACOUL P, FREEDMAN B. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems[J].Environmental Reviews,2006,14(2):89-136. [31]REDDY K R, DEBUSK T A. State-of-the-art utilization of aquatic plants in water pollution control[J].Water Science and Technology,1987,19(10):61-79. [32]HERSHNER C, HAVENS K J. Managing invasive aquatic plants in a changing system:strategic consideration of ecosystem services[J].Conservation Biology,2008,22(3):544-550. [33]KAWATA M, HAYASHI M, HARA T. Interactions between neighboring algae and snail grazing in structuring microdistribution patterns of periphyton[J].Oikos,2001,92(3):404-416. [34]李宽意,文明章,杨宏伟,等.“螺-草”的互利关系[J].生态学报,2007,27(12):5427-5432. [35]CORREIA A M. Food choice by the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii[J].Annales Zoologici Fennici,2003,40(6):517-528. [36]CRUZ M J, REBELO R. Colonization of freshwater habitats by an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in Southwest Iberian Peninsula[J].Hydrobiologia,2007,575(1):191-201. [37]许巧情,王洪铸,张世萍.河蟹过度放养对湖泊底栖动物群落的影响[J].水生生物学报,2003,27(1):41-46. [38]王桂民,罗明,张金彪,等.水蚯蚓高产养殖技术[J].水产养殖,2017,38(2):51-52. [39]谢文星,董方勇,谢山,等.克氏原螯虾的食性、繁殖和栖息习性研究[J].水利渔业,2008,29(4):63-65. [40]温小波,库夭梅,罗静波.温度、体重及摄食状态对克氏原螯虾代谢的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2003,22(2):152-156. [41]徐增洪,周鑫,水燕.克氏原螯虾的食物选择性及其摄食节律[J].大连海洋大学学报,2012,27(2):166-170. [42]禹娜,刘一,姜雪芹,等.上海城区小型河道生物组成特征及食物链结构分析[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010(6):91-100. [43]李威,成永旭,孙颖,等.秸秆还田配施氮肥对冬春季稻虾田水质、土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(7):1051-1060. [44]蔡履冰.太湖流域水体富营养化成因及防治对策的初步研究[J].中国环境监测,2003,19(3):52-55. [45]劳秀荣,孙伟红,王真,等.秸秆还田与化肥配合施用对土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤学报,2003,40(4):618-623.
2023, Vol. 42 
