|
|
|
| Reconstruction and Identification of Beak Morphology in Purpleback Flying Squid Sthenoeuthis oualaniensis |
| LI Qingying1, LIU Bilin1,2,3,4,5, OU Liguo1, GU Xinyu1, CHU Moxian1, BU Xinyu1 |
1. College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
2. The Key Laboratory of SustainableExploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
3. National Distant-Water Fisheries Engineering Research Center, Shanghai 201306, China;
4. Key Laboratory of OceanicFisheries Exploration, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201306, China;
5. Scientific Observing andExperimental Station of Oceanic Fishery Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Shanghai 201306, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Purpleback flying squid Sthenoeuthis oualaniensis is a kind of marine cephalopod with abundant resources. Understanding of the population structure of purpleback flying squid is beneficial to the evaluation and management of fishery resources. Beak as hard tissue is a good material for identifying the populations of purpleback flying squid, so 161 squid samples collected from the Middle East Pacific, northwest Indian Ocean and East Indian Ocean were used to analyze and distinguish the upper and lower beaks by Fourier transform. The three views of upper and lower beaks were transformed into 20 sets of elliptic Fourier descriptors by software. The three views of upper and lower beaks were reconstructed, and then principal component analysis and stepwise discriminant analysis were carried out. The results of principal component analysis showed that the first two principal components of elliptic Fourier descriptors explained 67.4%, 70.8%, 65.8%, 80.7%, 63.0% and 57.8% of the total variation for lateral, ventral and oral view of upper beak and lower beak, respectively; the results of discriminant analysis showed that the success rates of discriminant analysis were 87.0%, 82.6%, 83.2%, 85.7%, 88.8% and 72.0% respectively; the contour of the six views reconstructed by Fourier analysis reflected the differences among the populations of squid in the three sea areas. Therefore, it is suggested that the geographic population of purpleback flying squid can be identified by analyzing the contour morphology of the six views of the beaks with Fourier transform, and the correct rate of population identification can be improved by using three views.
|
|
Received: 09 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]陈新军,刘必林,王尧耕.世界头足类[M].北京:海洋出版社,2009:190-194.
[2]王尧耕,陈新军.世界大洋性经济柔鱼类资源及其渔业[M].北京:海洋出版社,2005:190-194.
[3]陈新军.世界头足类资源开发现状及我国远洋鱿钓渔业发展对策[J].上海海洋大学学报,2019,28(3):321-330.
[4]张鹏,杨吝,张旭丰,等.南海金枪鱼和鸢乌贼资源开发现状及前景[J].南方水产,2010,6(1):68-74.
[5]刘必林,陈新军,钟俊生.印度洋西北海域鸢乌贼耳石的形态特征分析[J].上海水产大学学报,2008,17(5):604-609.
[6]刘必林,陈新军,钟俊生.采用耳石研究印度洋西北海域鸢乌贼的年龄、生长和种群结构[J].大连水产学院学报,2009,24(3):206-212.
[7]刘必林,陈新军.印度洋西北海域鸢乌贼角质颚长度分析[J].渔业科学进展,2010,31(1):8-14.
[8]陆化杰,张旭,童玉和,等.中国南海西沙群岛海域鸢乌贼耳石微结构及生长特性[J].水产学报,2020,44(5):767-776.
[9]LIU B L, FANG Z, CHEN X J, et al. Spatial variations in beak structure to identify potentially geographic populations of Dosidicus gigas in the Eastern Pacific Ocean[J].Fisheries Research,2015,164:185-192.
[10]刘必林,陈新军.头足类角质颚的研究进展[J].水产学报,2009,33(1):157-164.
[11]陈芃,方舟,陈新军.基于角质颚外部形态学的柔鱼种群判别[J].海洋渔业,2015,37(1):1-9.
[12]贾涛.东南太平洋茎柔鱼种群结构及其空间异质性分析[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2011.
[13]勾艺萌,刘必林,孔祥洪.茎柔鱼的角质颚模式识别[J].水产科学,2022,41(2):296-303.
[14]欧利国,刘必林.基于地标点法的4种鲹科鱼类矢耳石形态分类[J].大连海洋大学学报,2020,35(1):114-120.
[15]欧利国,刘必林,方舟.基于椭圆傅里叶变换的鱼类矢耳石和听沟形态识别[J].海洋渔业,2019,41(4):385-396.
[16]刘必林,陈新军,方舟,等.基于角质颚长度的头足类种类判别[J].海洋与湖沼,2015,46(6):1365-1372.
[17]马迪,金岳,陈芃,等.基于角质颚形态的东海2种常见乌贼类的种类判别[J].上海海洋大学学报,2018,27(4):594-602.
[18]方舟,陈新军,金岳.基于角质颚的东、黄海头足类科类判别[J].上海海洋大学学报,2019,28(3):365-372.
[19]方舟,苏杭,陈新军,等.地标点法对两种头足类上下颚的判别差异分析[C]//2015年中国水产学会学术年会论文集.杭州:中国水产学会,2015:263.
[20]马迪,金岳,陈芃,等.利用角质颚形态判别东海两种常见枪乌贼[J].水产学报,2019,43(2):419-430.
[21]苏杭,方舟,陈新军.2种大洋性柔鱼类角质颚形态识别法的比较[J].海洋渔业,2016,38(3):225-235.
[22]IWATA H, UKAI Y. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors[J].Journal of Heredity,2002,93(5):384-385.
[23]FERGUSON G, MESSENGER J, BUDELMANN B. Gravity and light influence the countershading reflexes of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis[J].The Journal of Experimental Biology,1994,191(1):247-256.
[24]韩霈武,陈新军,方舟,等.基于鱼体和耳石形态的东海两种鲐属鱼类判别分析[J].海洋渔业,2020,42(2):161-169.
[25]魏联,朱国平,刘子俊.基于形态学及傅里叶分析对两种南极冰鱼耳石外型的研究[J].极地研究,2017,29(2):218-227.
[26]方华华,李翔,董晓煜.傅里叶分析在江鳕矢耳石形态中的应用[J].水产科学,2017,36(3):364-368.
[27]王英俊.傅里叶分析在鱼类耳石形态学中的应用研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2010.
[28]曾祥波,张国华.基于傅立叶耳石形态分析法对几种家鱼仔稚鱼的种类判别分析[J].中国水产科学,2012,19(6):970-977.
[29]金岳.基于硬组织的中国近海枪乌贼渔业生物学研究[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2018.
[30]CAMPANA S E, CASSELMAN J M. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1993,50(5):1062-1083.
[31]魏联,朱国平.基于椭圆傅里叶分析的次南极电灯鱼矢耳石形态多样性[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(9):3078-3086.
[32]CLARKE E M R. A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1986:217-1624.
[33]KEAR A J. Morphology and function of the mandibular muscles in some coleoid cephalopods[J].Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,1994,74(4):801-822.
[34]何静茹,陆化杰,陈炫妤,等.冬春季西北印度洋鸢乌贼角质颚外部形态及生长特性[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(8):2775-2784.
[35]梁佳伟,彭苗苗,陈新军,等.北太平洋2种鱿鱼类角质颚生长特性及其种类判别[J].上海海洋大学学报,2021,30(3):546-554. |
|
|
|
